The Importance of First-Party Data

With less reliance on third-party cookies, first-party data is becoming crucial. It’s valuable because it’s more accurate and comes directly from your audience, with their permission. For publishers, it’s time to focus on collecting high-quality first-party data. This means being transparent about what data you’re collecting and why, and using this data to create a more engaging experience for your visitors.

As we navigate through the transition away from third-party cookies, it’s essential to understand the timeline that outlines the major milestones and phases. This timeline helps visualize the shift towards a more privacy-focused online advertising ecosystem, marking key periods of testing, adaptation, and final implementation of new technologies.

Understanding Privacy Sandbox

For website owners, it’s important to get familiar with how Privacy Sandbox works and what it means for the future of online advertising. This involves exploring new tools and technologies that allow for personalization in a privacy-focused way.

Google has introduced several initiatives under the Privacy Sandbox umbrella. Among these initiatives, the Topics API and Protected Audience API stand out as key components of this new era.

Topics API: This approach enables a browser to determine a user’s interests based on their web browsing activity. Rather than tracking an individual across the internet, it identifies broad interest areas such as “sports” or “cooking.” This helps in delivering ads that are relevant to the user’s interests without infringing on their privacy.

Protected Audience API: Formerly known as FLEDGE, this tool also seeks to deliver relevant advertising by categorizing users into “interest groups” based on the types of sites they visit. It aims to show ads that the user is likely to find engaging or useful, without the need for tracking individual browsing history.

Adapting to this new environment requires a willingness to experiment and learn. Publishers must be agile, ready to test out Privacy Sandbox’s alternatives, and other privacy-preserving technologies as they become available. Engaging actively during the standstill phase will be key to developing effective strategies that minimize disruption to ad operations and maintain, if not grow their ad revenues.

For publishers managing several websites under one brand, the concept of Related Websites has been introduced. This setup allows some cookies to be shared between these websites, almost like they are from third parties. This method allows browsers to grant very limited access to third-party cookies for designated purposes, balancing privacy concerns with functional necessity. Specifically, Chrome utilizes these declared relationships to make informed decisions on when to permit or restrict a site’s access to cookies in a third-party context. For site authors looking to leverage this capability, it’s essential to submit their domains to a set, following the detailed submission guidelines available on GitHub. 

Based on a test conducted by one of our partners, it was observed that for the 0.75% of all Chrome users who no longer had access to third-party cookies but had the Topics API enabled, there was a decrease in Revenue Per Thousand Impressions (RPM) by 35%. However, in a promising turn of events, the win rate for Adx and open bidding simultaneously saw an increase of +4%. 

GAM: Identity insights

Google Ad Manager (GAM) has introduced a useful feature that aids publishers in comprehending the nuances of this transition. This feature offers publishers a detailed breakdown of the current landscape of identifiers, which is crucial for tailoring advertising strategies amidst growing privacy concerns.

This feature meticulously categorizes identifiers into distinct statuses, providing a few options available to publishers. It differentiates between:

• Third-party ID status: This indicates whether third-party cookies or device IDs are available for use in targeting. Given the ongoing deprecation of third-party cookies, understanding their availability becomes essential for publishers looking to adjust their strategies.
• PPID status: PPIDs, or Publisher Provided Identifiers, are first-party identifiers directly sent with the ad request by Ad Manager 360 publishers. This segment allows publishers to see how often these identifiers are being utilized, offering insights into the extent to which first-party data is driving addressability.
• First-party ID status: This involves identifiers confined to a publisher’s own sites or apps, such as “same app key” on iOS or _gads on the web. These serve as fallback mechanisms when third-party cookies are unavailable. It’s crucial to note that this category excludes PPIDs, providing a clear distinction between different types of first-party identifiers.

Additionally, the feature distinguishes between “Active” and “Restricted” statuses for these identifiers. “Active” implies that the IDs were available for personalization, thereby enabling targeted advertising. In contrast, “Restricted” signifies that while the IDs were present, their use for personalization was limited, reflecting the constraints imposed by privacy regulations or browser settings.

Google also added:”Topics status,” which reports whether the ad request included topics for targeted advertising, with values indicating whether topics were provided, empty, or not available due to lack of support or other reasons. Furthermore, “Publisher Provided Signals” offer publishers the capability to enrich ad requests with IAB taxonomy categories, enhancing targeting precision. Other dimensions such as “PPID presence” and “User identifier status” provide further insights into the availability and utilization of identifiers.

In conclusion, the end of third-party cookies signals a new era for digital publishing, marked by a huge focus on privacy and data protection. By embracing first-party data, engaging with emerging technologies, and fostering transparency and trust with their audience, publishers can navigate these changes successfully. The journey ahead is complex, but with the right strategies and a proactive approach, publishers can generate new opportunities for growth in a privacy-first world.

The post Adapting to the New Cookieless reality: An Expert Update for Publishers first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.

What are Prebid Timeouts?

Imagine, as a publisher, you’re hosting a programmatic auction where ads are the star of the show. When a visitor lands on your website, you kick off this auction. It’s not just any auction, though. It’s a speedy, high-stakes game where various SSPs have a limited window to place their bids for the opportunity to display their ads to your users. This is where the concept of “timeout” enters the stage.

A timeout in Prebid is essentially a countdown timer. It tells these SSPs how long they’ve got to throw their hat into the ring. If they don’t bid in time, they miss out, and the auction moves forward without them. The focal point of our discussion, the “Auction Timeout,” is critical because it determines how long this window stays open.

A Word on Our Research Methodology

Our study was a series of A/B tests of various Prebid Timeout settings conducted on four websites differing in structure (ranging from traditional news sites to specialized portals and web application-like platforms), various shares of Directly sold ad impressions(from 8% to 100%), and the share of Header Bidding (from 2% to 22%). This diversity provided a broad spectrum of insights into how different factors influence timeout optimization. It’s important to note we’re discussing client-side Prebid integrations here.

The Quest for the Perfect Timeout Setting

If you’re a publisher who has recently embraced Header Bidding technology through Prebid, you might still be operating with the default timeout settings – typically, an Auction Timeout of 1000 milliseconds (ms) and a Failsafe Timeout of 3000 ms. These settings are a solid starting point and might even hit the mark perfectly right off the bat for some publishers. Our extensive experience working with more than 1000 publishers has taught us that 1000 ms often serves as the minimum threshold for an optimal timeout setting. It’s rare to see the optimal setting to dip below this mark. 

The sweet spot for Prebid timeouts usually ranges between 1000 ms and 2500 ms. However, it’s not uncommon to encounter scenarios where a longer timeout is present, though such decisions should always be backed by extensive testing. 

An exciting aspect of Header Bidding auctions is that the actual wait time may not always reach the maximum set, such as 2500 ms. For instance, if the last SSP in the pool sends back a response and the auction concludes at 1500 ms, there’s no need to wait longer. Thus, the optimal timeout balances two critical factors: the potential for increased revenue from Header Bidding, thanks to SSPs having ample time to respond, and the risk of losing ad requests due to prolonged waiting periods.

Why Timing is Everything

Finding the right timeout setting is crucial for maintaining a fast-loading website while ensuring maximum ad revenue. By carefully increasing the Auction Timeout, you give SSPs a better chance to respond with their bids, potentially driving up your ad revenue by securing higher bid amounts. Yet, there’s a tipping point. Increase the timeout too much, and you might start seeing a drop in user engagement. Visitors are likely to abandon a site that takes too long to load, leading to fewer ad impressions and, consequently, lower ad revenue. The goal is to find a timeout duration that allows for competitive bidding among SSPs without negatively impacting the user experience.

Setting a longer timeout means you might lose some ad requests. This is because making users wait longer can lead to some of them leaving your site before ads finish loading.

This situation leads to a decrease in the number of ads available for display across all advertising channels, including Google AdX, AdSense, and direct ads. It’s important to note that for sites with a tiny share of revenue from Header Bidding (2-3%), the potential uplift in Prebid based revenue is very unlikely to offset the losses from missed ad requests on the entire ad stack. In such cases, if, despite increasing timeouts Header Bidding share remains marginal, it is crucial to investigate the reasons behind the low Prebid revenue share further and look deeper into such matters as limited SSP participation, low demand, inappropriate ad formats, or incorrect settings in Google Ad Manager (GAM), and attempt to improve these aspects. If losses still outweigh gains despite these efforts, discontinuing Header Bidding might be the most logical course of action.

The Fine Art of Timeout Optimization

Finding the right Auction Timeout is not about guesswork but testing. Some website owners employ A/B testing, which involves comparing two different timeout settings to see which one generates the most revenue at the end of the day. This approach allows you to make data-driven decisions that can significantly impact your ad earnings and is generally speaking the most accurate one.

Moreover, diving into your website’s analytics can provide a wealth of insights. Observing how changes in timeout settings affect your site’s traffic and ad revenue over time can guide you to the most effective configuration. Advanced analytics tools can offer a deeper dive, revealing how quickly each SSP typically responds and how different timeout settings impact your overall ad strategy.

Publishers who cannot employ A/B testing may try to select periods with stable traffic and user session data, without significant fluctuations, for testing – utilizing tools like Google Analytics to identify these optimal testing windows. This approach is much less accurate than A/B testing and in case of many publishers does not allow to get conclusive results due to performance fluctuations that result from different things than changed Timouts. 

Regardless of whether you employ A/B testing or period do period comparison having access to Prebid’s detailed reports helps a lot with this. It lets you see how each Bidder (SSP) bidding on your ads is doing, like how quickly they respond and how often they win auctions. This makes it easier to figure out how to get the most out of your ad inventory.

Impact of changing the timeout on your ad stack’s revenue

When you adjust the timeout settings, you might see your earnings go up a bit, but only to a certain limit, especially when your initial settings were on the lower end. It’s important to find that sweet spot where waiting a bit longer for ads to load helps you earn more without going too far. Also, think about how changing the timeout affects your total revenue, including both the ads you sell directly and those sold through the open market. Remember, finding the right timeout setting is a balance – it can help increase your income from ads, but there’s a point where making users wait longer doesn’t pay off anymore.

Revenue vs. Timeout Charts: Differentiating Between Sites With and Without Direct Sale

We looked into what might happen if we changed timeout settings for each ad unit, thinking it could generate additional revenue. To do this, we looked at the revenue generated by the best timeout (as determined on domain level) vs the revenue generated by the best timeout setting for each ad unit independently.. The results, unfortunately, were not super positive. In theory, doing this could make us a little more money, from nothing extra up to 1.8% more. But that’s just in theory. In the real world, based on what we’ve seen, the actual boost in money is usually at least 25% less than what such estimations show
Furthermore, adjusting timeouts settings per device resulted in even lower improvement – around 0.5%.

This small increase is a bit of a letdown because for publishers diving deep into the granularity of adjusting timeouts for individual ad units, the results, though positive, may not always justify the effort (and an increase in the script size to “communicate” to each ad unit the independently set up timeout setting). While each incremental improvement in ad revenue is valuable, publishers must weigh the operational complexities and resource investments against the relatively modest gains achievable through this approach.

Constancy of Optimal Timeouts Over Time

The behavior of optimal Prebid timeouts over time seems steady, constant and predictable. Despite expecting rapid changes in the programmatic world, the ideal timeouts for these auctions don’t vary much as time passes by. We’ve seen it hover around two similar values, with just a few unusual days here and there. Still, generally, it stays the same. This shows that for most publishers, it is completely enough to set an a/b test, determine the optimal timeout and forget about this setting for at least the next couple of months.

How Adjusting Timeouts Affects Ad Visibility and CTR

When we change timeouts for ads to bid in Prebid, it also slightly changes how often people see the ads (Viewability) and how often they click on them (CTR). Making the wait time a bit longer can make a slight difference in making ad impressions more visible by about 1 to 2 percent. But, when it comes to clicks, especially on websites that use a lot of programmatic ads and Header Bidding, increasing the wait time doesn’t really help. In fact, the more we rely on these types of ads and extend the wait time, the less likely people are to click on the ads. This happens because in the world of Header Bidding, the focus isn’t so much on getting immediate clicks. 

Mastering prebid timeouts with Prebid Stack

Our journey through the nuances of Prebid timeouts highlights the importance of adaptability and precision, a process greatly simplified by Prebid Stack. As the programmatic landscape shifts, Prebid Stack provides the tools you need for optimizing and managing prebid, including detailed timeout settings and an advanced A/B testing panel. Embrace the cycle of testing, learning, and iterating with the support of Prebid Stack, and navigate the path to sustainable growth in programmatic advertising.

The post A simple guide to prebid timeouts first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.

User Consent and Ad Blocking Challenges

Privacy Regulations and User Consent: The enforcement of GDPR, CCPA, and other privacy regulations has transformed the digital advertising ecosystem, placing user consent at the forefront. Publishers now face the intricate task of monetizing their digital content without infringing upon user privacy rights.

The Ad Blocking Phenomenon: The widespread use of ad blockers and the increasing preference for non-personalized advertising further complicate the revenue generation model for publishers. This scenario necessitates innovative solutions that respect user privacy while ensuring sustainable ad revenue for publishers.

Prebid Stack offers a promising solution by enabling publishers to display ads even in the presence of ad blockers or when users opt out of certain data processing activities. It allows to implement an anti-ad-block feature, allowing publishers to reclaim potential lost revenues and serve ads that respect user consent preferences.

While some users may provide full consent for all data gathering and usage purposes, others use their right to selectively choose which purposes they are comfortable with. This selection process raises an important question for publishers: How is it possible to serve ads to users who do not give full consent for all the TCF-listed purposes?

The answer lies in the flexibility of header bidding solutions like Prebid Stack, which enable the serving of ads even when users decline consent for certain purposes. The TCF outlines various purposes for data processing, and not all are equally critical for the ad serving process. For instance, Google Ad Manager (GAM) and certain Supply-Side Platforms (SSPs) might require consent for specific purposes to serve ads effectively.

However, when users specifically deny consent for purposes such as 2 (Use limited data to select advertising), 7 (Measure advertising performance), 9 (Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources), and 10 (Develop and improve services), serving ads through GAM can become challenging. Despite this, the situation is not entirely bleak. There exists a subset of bidders within the header bidding ecosystem willing to accept ad requests and engage in the bidding process without consent for these particular purposes.

This capability underscores the importance for publishers to understand which SSPs can accommodate such requests. Certain SSPs have clarified in their terms and conditions, or through direct communication, that they do not require consent for these specific purposes to place a bid. This knowledge is crucial for publishers looking to navigate the consent landscape efficiently, ensuring that opportunities for ad serving and revenue generation are maximized even when full consent is not granted by the user.

How does the non-consent traffic monetization feature work?

Upon a user’s arrival on a website, Prebid Stack determines the user’s TCF consent status, categorizing them into one of two groups:

1.Users who give their consent for all the purposes 2, 7, 9, and 10.
2.Users who withhold their consent for any of the purposes 2, 7, 9, and 10.

For the first group, Prebid Stack proceeds as usual, conducting the ad auction and communicating the necessary information to Google Ad Manager (GAM) and the SSPs.

However, for the second group, Prebid Stack adopts a customized strategy. It specifically targets ad requests to bidders that have been pre-identified for their willingness to participate in
such cases – it bypasses GAM.

Automatic and Manual Bidder Selection:

For demand originating from Yieldbird (Yieldbird bidders), this bidder selection process is automated. We have pre-identified bidders agreeable to bidding under these consent restrictions, thereby eliminating the need for publishers to manually adjust settings within the interface.

On the other hand, publishers utilizing their own SSP accounts (Own bidders) will need to undertake this selection process themselves. It’s important for those publishers to review the SSP’s terms and conditions or reach out to them directly to ascertain their stance on bidding without consent.

Conclusion: Balancing Privacy and Profitability with Prebid Stack

In summary, Prebid Stack offers a strategic solution for publishers facing the complexities of user consent under the TCF. By differentiating between users based on their consent for specific purposes and adapting ad requests accordingly, it allows publishers to bypass the constraints of Google Ad Manager (GAM) in scenarios of partial consent. This not only aligns with privacy regulations but also ensures publishers can sustain their ad revenue, highlighting Yieldbird’s innovative approach to overcoming digital advertising challenges.

The post Unlocking Non-Consent Traffic Revenue: Monetize Efficiently with Prebid Stack first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.

Why TCF v2.2 matters in today’s digital landscape?

Launched back in April 2018, the TCF (Transparency & Consent Framework) has really helped make sense of the fast-moving world of digital ads, while also sticking to the tough rules of things like the ePrivacy Directive and GDPR. It’s all about setting a standard that really values user privacy, and now, Yieldbird’s totally on board with this too.

Setting standards: Yieldbird’s commitment to users

By using TCF’s clear-cut way of doing things, we at Yieldbird are making things better for users. We’re all about giving them simple, easy-to-understand choices for their privacy. With integrating TCF’s standardized approach, Yieldbird is enhancing the user experience, providing clear, concise, and user-friendly options for privacy choices. Our goal is to empower users, giving them control over their data and the assurance of privacy.

Our TCF membership signifies our commitment to ethical advertising. We’re now part of a collective that shapes policies and practices, ensuring they align with the evolving digital advertising landscape while keeping user rights at the forefront.

Implementing Practical Requirements: Adhering to TCF v2.2 means Yieldbird is not just compliant but also a forerunner in applying practical requirements that stem from guidelines of Data Protection Authorities.

As we embark on this journey with the TCF, we’re not just advocating for a shift in programmatic advertising; we’re actively participating in a movement that prioritizes transparency, respect, and user privacy. This is not just a compliance milestone; it’s a statement to our commitment to creating a digital ecosystem where user trust is our top priority.

The post Yieldbird embraces IAB Europe’s TCF v2.2 for Enhanced User Privacy and Compliance first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.

In this context, green programmatic advertising is becoming more crucial because it is a powerful tool for businesses to communicate their commitment to environmental responsibility. It allows brands to showcase eco-friendly practices, highlight sustainable products, and share initiatives to reduce environmental impact. This not only resonates with environmentally conscious consumers but also builds trust and loyalty among a growing segment of the market that prioritizes sustainability.

Sustainable Programmatic Deals 

Right now, the need for green advertising is not driven by regulatory requirements. But as we see a broad global shift toward sustainability, it is a strategic imperative for businesses to participate in an environmentally conscious advertising marketplace.

Programmatic deals were always on the leading edge of any changes and developments in the programmatic industry. After all, they allow various additional features to be added by the publishers or the supply-side platforms (SSPs), which are not accessible if the transactions are done on the open exchange.

This includes the shift toward more sustainable marketing practices. By leveraging programmatic deals, advertisers can strategically target audiences on eco-friendly platforms, such as marketplaces for used clothing and accessories. But they can also optimize their media buying process to minimize their carbon footprint. This not only enhances the visibility of sustainable products but also aligns advertising efforts with environmental consciousness.

The essence of programmatic deals lies in their ability to optimize ad placements, ensuring they resonate with eco-conscious consumers. These deals facilitate a seamless connection between advertisers and consumers focused on environmentally friendly products and services. For example, in the case of a news publisher, the programmatic deal can only target specific ad units in articles about sustainability, renewable energy, circular economy, etc. The result is a win-win situation – advertisers reach a targeted audience genuinely interested in sustainable products while consumers discover products aligned with their values.

Furthermore, programmatic advertising allows for precise campaign impact measurement, including calculating carbon footprints. This feature was made available by two leading SSPs Marketplaces: Equativ (formerly known as Smart) and Adform. This level of transparency was unavailable previously. Now, it empowers advertisers to assess and refine their strategies, minimizing environmental impact while maximizing reach and effectiveness.

Carbon Footprint Measurement in Programmatic Deals

Let’s go with an example. The programmatic deal set up in Equativ SSP allows the buyer to calculate and get a report of the carbon footprint of each part of the media delivery process: from the campaign set up to the reporting. Several factors are considered into the carbon emission calculation, such as devices, deal type, creative size, format and duration and much more.

The Equativ Campaign carbon impact report allows us to check which device categories were the most energy efficient or which creatives caused the most footprint. In the preliminary information supplied by Equativ, we see some interesting conclusions. 

There were no surprises regarding the specific creative footprint: the lighter the creative, the less negative environmental impact. The worst were the longer video creatives and the heaviest display or rich media ads. In regards to the device categories, the most efficient were the mobile phones: smartphone < TV < tablet < PC. 

In a first test campaign, Equativ’s methodology reduced the carbon impact by 64%, generating 37g of CO2 emitted per 1k impressions versus 103g as a benchmark. The environmental impact of the campaign represents the equivalent of driving 27.76 kilometers, compared to 76.8 kilometers for a non-optimized campaign.

“In the digital advertising ‘value chain,’ which encompasses the journey from conceptualizing an idea to the moment when an advertisement reaches the user and the subsequent reporting of results to the advertiser, multiple stages are involved. Each of these stages needs the use of energy. Hence, we meticulously examine the entire campaign delivery process to initially quantify the energy consumption associated with each step. Subsequently, we focus on reducing this energy consumption by optimizing the path and refining the underlying processes while guaranteeing the meet of expected performance from our partners.”,

says Marcin CZACHOROWSKI, Senior Manager, Demand Partnerships at Equativ.

For detailed information on green programmatic deals, check the presentation from our recent event.

Go For Responsible Programmatic Advertising

In essence, programmatic deals are not just revolutionizing the advertising landscape but steering it towards a greener, more sustainable future. As brands increasingly prioritize eco-friendly messaging, programmatic deals are a key enabler, paving the way for a more environmentally conscious and responsible advertising ecosystem.

If you’re interested in sustainable programmatic deals, contact our team to get to know the offer. 

The post How Programmatic Deals Are Leading the Way to Sustainable Advertising first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.

Even though you may try your best, you’re only human, and humans make mistakes. But wait a minute, would there be a solution to help me out with this and automate the process of Open Market pricing strategy setup? Here it is – Google Optimized Floor Prices. But the real question is, are you getting the most out of it? What about alternatives for GAM users?

In this article, we delve into the powerful mechanisms of Google Optimized Floor Prices and the other solution – Price Genius, two cutting-edge tools designed to boost your earnings. Let’s explore how these tools work, their similarities, and the key differences that set them apart.

Google Optimized Floor Prices: Unleashing the Power of Machine Learning

Google Optimized Floor Prices is a revolutionary flooring mechanism embedded within unified pricing rules. Unlike traditional floor prices and target eCPM, it harnesses the prowess of machine learning to adjust floor price levels dynamically. The primary objective? Maximizing a publisher’s long-term revenue while preventing excess unfilled impressions.

Key Features

• Automatic Adjustment: Fully automated, it ensures hassle-free operation on any part of the publisher’s inventory.
• Overrides Unified Pricing Rules: Google Optimized Floor Prices take precedence over unified pricing rules, except for advertiser-specific rules.
• Experimentation: Publishers can set up experiments to optimize the performance and maximize revenue potential.

Price Genius: Elevating Revenue with AI-Powered Precision

Price Genius is an AI-powered automatic floor price management tool designed to elevate publishers’ revenue. This solution employs machine learning algorithms to determine optimal daily floor prices for each managed ad unit, ensuring a data-driven approach to maximize earnings.

Key Features:

• AI-Powered Precision: Utilizing machine learning, Price Genius selects optimal floor prices on selected ad units daily to maximize revenue.
• Benchmarking Mechanism: Equipped with a built-in benchmarking mechanism and a dedicated reporting dashboard for performance evaluation.
• Traffic Segmentation: Uses key values to split traffic, aiding in modeling and benchmarking for better decision-making. 

See Price Genius in action:

• How Wallapop Optimized Pricing Strategy and Generated 8.6% Uplift
• How Taboola News Optimized Pricing and Generated 11% Uplift With Price Genius

Can Google Optimized Floor Prices and Price Genius Coexist?

While both tools share similarities, they operate in distinct ways, making simultaneous use challenging. Google Optimized Floor Prices and Price Genius cannot handle the same part of the inventory and traffic concurrently. However, publishers can leverage the strengths of both tools by using Google Optimized Floor Prices on the benchmark part of the traffic, while Price Genius will manage the rest.

Key Similarities:

• Machine Learning-Based: Both tools harness the power of machine learning for automatic floor price adjustments.
• Automation: Fully automated processes ensure efficiency and ease of use.
• No Interference: Both tools will override other rules (except advertiser-based rules) on the traffic they handle.

Key Differences:

• Frequency of Adjustments: Price Genius maximizes daily revenue with frequent adjustments, while Google Optimized Floor Prices prioritize long-term value preservation with less frequent adjustments.
• Reporting and Benchmarking: Price Genius provides a dedicated reporting dashboard and built-in benchmarking mechanisms, whereas Google Optimized Floor Prices relies on the publisher for performance evaluation.

Price Genius is GAM’s Perfect Extension

In conclusion, Google Optimized Floor Prices and Price Genius are powerful tools to maximize publishers’ revenue potential in the dynamic world of digital advertising. 

Do you want to challenge Google Optimized Floor Prices from your GAM? Experience the benefits firsthand by trying a free Price Genius trial. Witness the seamless integration of AI-powered precision into your ad revenue management. Don’t miss out—empower your publishing journey now!

The post Open Market Pricing Strategy: Google Optimized Floor Prices and Price Genius first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.

In this guide, we’ll dish out some tips to help you increase Black Friday programmatic revenue. Ready? Let’s dive in!

What happened on Black Friday last year?

Black Friday 2022 boosted retailers, with shoppers eagerly hunting for deals. Barclaycard, a significant processor of UK debit and credit card transactions, reported a notable 3.2% increase in transactions compared to the previous year. Moreover, Nationwide revealed that the prior year’s Black Friday had become their busiest day on record.

Across the Atlantic in the US, Black Friday 2022 raked in an impressive $9.12 billion in sales, while Cyber Monday smashed records with a remarkable $11.3 billion in sales, surpassing all previous years. 

Given these encouraging figures from 2022, we anticipate that this year’s Black Friday and Cyber Monday will continue to be successful for retailers, with increased sales and heightened website traffic. As consumers become more accustomed to online shopping and continue seeking great deals, robust sales during this holiday shopping weekend are expected to persist and possibly reach new heights in 2023. As you may guess, it will be an excellent opportunity for digital publishers to earn extra programmatic revenue.

7 Tips To Increase Black Friday Programmatic Revenue

1. Check Your Inventory

Publishers need to prepare in advance, just like the shoppers who camp out for those sweet Black Friday deals. Analyze your website’s performance and identify the most profitable ad slots. Ensure your ad spaces are ready and optimized for the big day. 

Don’t let outdated and underperforming ad units clutter your website. Do some spring cleaning (well, it’s technically autumn) and declutter your inventory. Focus on high-quality, engaging ad formats to attract more advertisers and increase your CPM.

2. Enhance Targeting Strategy

In the quest for higher CPMs, publishers must align their inventory with advertisers’ needs. Yet, without a sound targeting framework, delivering excellent ad exposure, encompassing viewability, impressions, and clicks, becomes challenging.

Despite industry concerns about third-party cookie tracking and ID solutions, this holiday season emphasizes the value of a targeting strategy grounded in first-party data. A blend of behavioral and contextual advertising, driven by first-party data, is poised to captivate various audience segments effectively.

To augment contextual targeting, publishers should harness Google Ad Manager’s key values. These additional parameters empower precise targeting criteria, such as content categories, sub-categories, or age ranges. It simplifies advertisers’ efforts to reach specific consumer groups while equipping publishers to make data-driven choices and assist advertisers in Google Ad Manager.

3. Curate High-performing Inventory Packages

With brands at the peak of their holiday campaigns, advertisers seek top-tier platforms for optimal brand visibility and conversions. Publishers can seize this opportunity by showcasing their most rewarding, high-performing inventory to secure superior CPMs.

While private auctions serve a purpose, direct deals shine when it comes to achieving higher CTR and conversion rates. By bundling their top-performing inventories into packages, publishers position themselves for fruitful negotiations with advertisers, yielding maximum returns during the holiday season.

4. Prioritize UX and Website Performance

In the holiday shopping rush, shoppers have no tolerance for slow-loading websites. Every second delay can cost publishers up to 2% of their impressions, with the actual impact likely exceeding this figure during peak holiday periods.

The key to greater engagement lies in delivering a seamless user experience through the right balance between ads and UX. It’s wise to remember about loading speed because the more content the website has to load, the more time your website needs, and more customers will flip away, annoyed by waiting. It is paramount during holiday campaigns, requiring publishers to leverage consumer insights for optimized websites.

5. Explore the Benefits of Ad Refresh

Amid the holiday frenzy, ad refresh solutions prove invaluable for publishers aiming to surpass their targets and expectations. In isolation, ad refresh increases a publisher’s revenue, even without accounting for the viewability booster effect. The timing couldn’t be better, with RPMs surging during this period. 

Refresher is a solution that empowers publishers to exercise complete control over their ad refresh rules, a valuable asset for those keen on adjusting their strategy during Black Friday.

6. Adjust Direct-Selling Approach

Publishers that primarily rely on programmatic channels will experience heightened RPMs due to the dynamism of real-time bidding. However, those who engage in direct selling must revise their rate cards and pricing strategies upwards to capitalize on the potential additional revenue advertisers are willing to offer for impressions during this festive period.

7. Optimize for Mobile Shoppers

With the rise of mobile shopping, ensure your website is mobile-friendly. It’s essential to provide an excellent user experience for shoppers on the go. Google loves mobile-friendly sites, and so do your potential advertisers.

Get Prepared to Black Friday

Black Friday programmatic revenue doesn’t have to be a mystery. With these tips, you’ll be well-prepared to boost your earnings and make your website the go-to destination for advertisers.

But besides the tips, we have a unique Black Friday offer. We know how many bid requests your website will get during this particular time. That’s why we would like to help you manage your prebid more efficiently, and we would like you to try Predbid Stack for three months for free*! What exactly does Prebid Stack do? Check it out here.

Stay proactive, be strategic, and keep your sense of humor intact – Black Friday is an adventure for publishers, too! 

* Three months for free with a limit of up to 500 million ad requests. The contract must be concluded by December 31, 2023.

The post 7 Ways to Increase Black Friday Programmatic Revenue first appeared on Yieldbird - Research Hub.